Sunday, June 2, 2013

Corporate Venturing


We will be having our next event on June 20th centered on Corporate Venturing. We had surveyed members to see which corporate strategy topics were of most interest to them and Corporate Venturing came to the top of the list. There has been a resurgence of Corporate Venture Capital, and this time it is not just isolated with Tech and Pharma companies (Automotive, Consumer Products, Manufacturing, Oil & Gas companies are all entering) and there has been significant growth in cross-industry investments (somewhat driven by multi-industry sweeping innovations such as clean-tech). Many of our members are seeking CVC funding, while others are contemplating forming a fund within their corporations. The discussion will seek to understand how Expansion-Stage companies should engage with corporate venture capital funds. What’s the best way to secure funding and build a long-lasting strategic relationship, go to the corporate venture group or try and find the right business unit/division manager to be your “champion”? We will also examine what it takes to set up a successful corporate venture fund. How do you create a culture that embraces external innovation as opposed to viewing it as a threat to internal R&D? How do you maintain post-investment support from the organization to ensure you are creating value? How do you measure the success of a corporate venture? Oftentimes the strategic value can be as much, if not more, important than the financial returns of the investment. We will also examine some emerging trends in Corporate Venture, such as the move to earlier stage investments as seen by the growth of corporate incubators. To ensure that we have as engaging and thought-provoking of a discussion as possible we will be doing something new this time around. We will be conducting primary research by interviewing experts in the field beforehand. We want to talk to both corporate venture capital professionals and members of startups that have received corporate funding. If you or anyone that you know fits the bill, please reach out to Raj (araj14@gsb.columbia.edu) and we will schedule a 30 minute interview over the next 1-2 weeks. We will also post a summary of our discussion after the event. 

3 comments:

  1. I wanted to thank all the participants in the June 20th NetForum breakfast on Corporate Venturing. This was an exciting event because of the intensity of the discussion, and the importance of the subject.

    Corporate Venturing is one of the multiple ways by which corporations seek to increase their innovation quotient. Some think of it as innovation outsourcing. But sometimes the corporation's objectives are not aligned with the interest of the startup. Hence the friction between the "engines of innovation" and "the seekers of innovation." And it can lead to considerable friction as these tectonic plates collide.

    In our research on the subject, an executive summary was distributed at the meeting and sent to our mailing list, and a final version will soon follow, we attempted to come up with "a how to" guide -- basically, we got off-the-record statements from Corporate VCs, ex-employees of CVCs and recipients of their largess. We asked, "OK we know it does not work in many cases, so what is your advice on how to do it right?" We got an earful during the research phase and at the meeting.

    Please continue to send us comments as we prepare the final report. We expect to release the final report in mid-July.

    L.O.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good news: the final report that Raj and I worked on over the summer on Corporate Venture Capital funds is now available. You can get it here: http://bit.ly/1cTgdfV

    It seems to me that the subject has really attracted a lot of attention in the last few months. I don't know whether it just seems that way to me because we have worked on this report, or whether it really has become a hot topic. A number of hyperactive CVCs have driven a surge in CVC investment over the last year according to various reports.

    This makes our own report timely and relevant. As in our breakfast meetings, we don't report data, we like to understand how things really work. So, we titled the report a "Practitioner's Guide." It's the insider story on the how to do it right and wrong...

    Hope you enjoy it. Don't hesitate to comment here or contact us by any other means.
    Laurent

    ReplyDelete